- Marcon article from v4 n1
- Lonigan commentary on Marcon article
- Marcon response to Lonigan commentary
- Editor's introduction to the discussion
Discussion:
Professor Lonigan is associate professor of psychology at Florida State University and associate director of the Florida Center for Reading Research (http://www.fcrr.org/). He has worked with Grover "Russ" Whitehurst, director of the Institute of Education Sciences, on emergent literacy and related issues, including the development of the National Center for Learning Disabilities' "Get Ready to Read" screening tool (http://www.getreadytoread.org/research.html Editor's note: This url has changed:http://www.getreadytoread.org/screening.php. Recent publications include "Development and Promotion of Emergent Literacy Skills in Preschool Children At-Risk of Reading Difficulties" in Preventing and Remediating Reading Difficulties: Bringing Science to Scale (B. Foorman, ed.), and "Temperamental Basis of Anxiety Disorders in Children" (with B. M. Phillips) in The Developmental Psychopathology of Anxiety (M. W. Vasey & M. R. Dadds, eds.).
Professor Marcon is a developmental psychologist and a professor of psychology at the University of North Florida. After working as a school psychologist in the barrios of East Los Angeles, she has held faculty positions in the Departments of Psychology at Clemson University, Davidson College, and the University of North Florida. She was also a senior research associate in the District of Columbia Public Schools where she initiated an ongoing longitudinal study of early childhood educational practices. The research reported here has been ongoing for more than a decade, and reports of its findings have been published in Early Childhood Research Quarterly, Developmental Psychology, and other scientific journals in the field.
The issues involved in this exchange matter a great deal to all who work with young children, as we struggle to understand more fully the nature of short- versus long-term effects of the pedagogical approaches we take. It is difficult to obtain hard data on the big issues (it is fairly easy to do so on the little ones, like knowledge of the alphabet) because the definitive experiments that would be required to provide the hard data may often be unethical to conduct.
The problem is not political but ideological. Ideologies are deeply held beliefs that fill the vacuum created by the unavailability of hard data. Our best strategy in such situations is to make our ideas and the data that we do have readily available to others who can subject them to vigorous argument and debate.
We are grateful to both contributors to this discussion for helping us to think more clearly about how best to approach the scientific as well as pedagogical issues involved in supporting our young children's growth, learning, and development.
